Scott faces increasing pressure on school funding

The chorus of voices calling for Gov. Rick Scott to veto a controversial education bill — and perhaps part of the state budget for public schools — grew this week, even as supporters tried to push back.


Two of the state’s major education organizations — the Florida School Boards Association and the Florida Association of District School Superintendents — sent letters to Scott Tuesday asking him to nix a wide-ranging schools bill (HB 7069) unveiled on the penultimate business day of the 2017 legislative session.

The superintendents went a step further and called on Scott to use his line-item veto to strike the Florida Education Finance Program, or FEFP, a move that would essentially force the legislature to pass a new education budget. The FEFP comprises the majority of state and local funding that flows to public schools.

The letters from the two organizations came on top of calls from the Florida Education Association for Scott to take dramatic action on HB 7069, a sweeping measure covering everything from school uniforms and sunscreen, to teacher bonuses and recess.

The measure is perhaps best known for its inclusion of a funding program for “schools of hope,” including charter schools in areas with academically struggling traditional schools, and an expansion of the “Best and Brightest” teacher bonus system.

The school boards’ association was particularly blistering about the way the bill was put together in budget negotiations between the House and Senate. The legislation emerged as a “conforming bill,” tied to the budget and essentially subject only to an up-or-down vote.

“Legislators took a six-page, single-subject bill, tacked on the content of two very contentious bills, and then added the camouflage of popular provisions from more than a dozen other bills to produce a 274-page behemoth. … We believe that this entire process for developing this conforming bill constitutes an abuse of the legislative process in general and the budget conference process in particular,” wrote Andrea Messina, the association’s executive director, and Tim Harris, its president and a member of the Polk County School Board.

Critics have also pointed out that, while there is a modest per-student increase of 0.34 percent in the FEFP by one measure, the per-student amount under another measure would drop. About 20 school districts are expected to see their revenues for each student drop if the current budget is signed by Scott.

Miami-Dade County Superintendent Alberto Carvalho suggested if Scott were to veto both HB 7069 and the FEFP, lawmakers could broadly spread nearly $419 million that was tucked into the conforming bill.

But supporters have begun mounting a counterattack. Earlier in the state board’s meeting, House Education Chairman Michael Bileca, R-Miami, defended the conforming legislation, which sprung largely from House ideas on charter schools and teacher bonuses.

“Our approach has been, how do we create this transformative approach to closing the achievement gap, to help really transform these persistently failing schools, as well as the areas of the highest poverty in our state,” Bileca said.

Meanwhile, the Florida chapter of PublicSchoolOptions.orgcalled on Scott to sign the bill.

“HB 7069 is a win for parents because it gives us more options for our children’s education and it entrusts us, not bureaucrats, to make these decisions for our children,” said Carmen Potter, a leader of the group in Florida. “After all, we know them best.”

It is not clear when Scott will have to make a final decision on the bill, which passed before the annual legislative session ended May 8. The governor has 15 days to sign or veto a bill after the legislature sends it to him, but lawmakers have not done that with the budget or HB 7069.